![]() |
![]() |
||
| School of Medicine Home > Departments > Dept of Medicine > General Internal Medicine > SMG > Patient Guide | |
|
Quality of CareA definition of quality of care, the measurement of quality, and the process of continuous improvement are currently undergoing intensive study and debate in the health care industry. The following is a summary to begin a dialogue between our patients and physicians. Patients and physicians are partners in promoting quality of care. Below are essential aspects of insuring quality of care in Primary Care Medicine as outlined by the Institute of Medicine and expanded by two groups of researchers. The first group (Drs. Safran, Tarlov, and Rogers -- see references) have expanded the key indicators first set forth by the Institute of Medicine and it is their structuring of how to look at quality of care in institutions which forms the basis of the presentation of this information for our patients. The second group (Drs. Emanuel and Dubler -- see references) direct their published studies and reviews on the patient-physician relationship and we have included aspects of their important work for your review. Please be sure to review the references at the end of this section to obtain further information to enhance your understanding of this important topic. Follow the links outlined to review how you can play a vital role in defining and ensuring quality of care in Primary Care Services. Accessibility (Financial and Organizational)The primary care practice must be accessible with the least barriers as possible for patients to access care (organizational) at a cost we can all afford (financial). Suggested ways to work on accessibility are as follows:
Accountability (Financial and Professional)Primary Care practices are accountable for both the financial aspects of their work and on a professional basis to our patients, health plans, and sponsoring institutions. Suggested ways we can work on accountability are as follows:
Continuity of CarePerhaps the key component in the generalist physician-patient relationship is the nurturing over time of a relationship which empowers the patient to take responsibility for his/her health utilizing the physician as a guide, resource, and companion. We can promote this together as follows:
Promoting Comprehensiveness of CareComprehensive medical care of the highest quality requires both generalist and specialist physicians, working together to define a scope of practice which enables the patient to achieve her or his health care goals. In addition, a committment to lifelong learning is essential if the generalist-physician is to maintain competence and continuous innovation of practice. We can ensure that Comprehensiveness is optimized by the following:
Coordination of CareGeneralist physicians are interested in the whole patient and coordinating your care is a key element of providing quality care. Collecting data, analyzing changes, and making further adjustments in your diagnostic and therapeutic regimen based on specialty evaluations can occur only when the generalist physician is an integral member of your health care team. We can ensure that coordination is optimized by the following:
Compassion
(NO) Conflict of interestAn excellent review of trust in the patient-physician relationship is outlined by Pellegrino, ED, Thomasma, DC. The Virtues in Medical Practice ( page 68 - see references). Some of the elements of trust as outlined by Drs. Pellegrino and Thomasma are:
The Stanford Medical Group physicians are committed to providing efficient, patient-centered health care. We do not receive additional compensation for withholding tests, writing prescriptions for any type of prescription, or for restricting use of hospital resources or specialty referrals. References and Suggestions for Further ReadingA variety of sources are available for further reading with regards to the patient-physician relationship and quality of care in primary care. The Stanford Health Library can provide some references, while others are available at local libraries or at Lane Library on the Stanford campus. Suggestions to get started are as follows:
This important study expands the previous defined indicators set forth by the Institute of Medicine in 1978 (accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, and accountability) to include both financial and organizational aspects of accessibility and both technical and interpersonal accountability. We have utilized this framework in presenting this information for our patients on quality of care. This ongoing longitudinal study of primary care is important for patients to review as it is partly based on patient-provided information and we encourage you to read the entire study.
These researchers have written extensively about the physician-patient relationship and this article is an excellent starting point for their studies. In this discussion, we have added two of their five "C's" (compassion, and (no) conflict of interest) to the quality indicators set forth by Drs. Safran, Tarlov, and Rogers. The remaining indicators: choice, competence, and communication are included in the areas of accessibility, accountability, and coordination. This article is an excellent starting point for study in the area of managed care and the physician-patient relationship and to the body of work by these authors.
This book provides an outstanding overview of a virtue-based ethic for medicine. Discusses are the following virtues: fidelity to trust, compassion, phronesis, justice, fortitude, temperance, integrity and self-effacement. The theory and practice of these virtues as it pertains to all health professionals is extensively discussed.
This was a recent excellent series which reviews the current status of quality of care theory, measurement, and future studies required before continuous improvement can occur in health care. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||